The Hartford

Also known as Hartford
Information not right? Contact Information or Bill Review incorrect? Let us know!
Contact Information
Name
The Hartford
Type
Insurance Company
daisyBill Payer ID
db03469
Hours of Operation
08:00 AM - 07:00 PM EDT
Telephone Numbers
Main
(866) 401-9222
Main
(866) 401-9222
Bill Review
The Hartford Medical Bill Processing Center
(800) 662-5814
Express Scripts
(800) 945-5951
Mitchell International
(800) 732-0153
CA Medical Provider Networks (MPNs)
Company Website

Hartford NATIONAL DATA

1,893
Total Provider Count
10,293
Total Injury Count
54,404
Total Bill Count
e-Bill
Bill Delivery
2%
Duplicate Bill %
7
Avg Days To Pay

Hartford CALIFORNIA DATA - REIMBURSEMENT STATISTICS

CA Average Days to Pay

For each bill sent from daisyBill software to Hartford, our technology tracks the count of business days it took Hartford to process the bill.

For the listed California workers’ comp fee schedules, this table reflects the average count of business days from Hartford’s receipt of a bill until the daisyBill client received an explanation of review (EOR) and payment from Hartford.

* California requires claims administrators to pay e-bills for medical treatment within 15 working days of receipt of the e-bill.

California Workers' Comp Fee Schedule
Average Days to Pay
Medical *
8.0
Interpreter
5.8
Medical-Legal
9.0
Facility *
8.0
Copy Service
21.7

CA Official Medical Fee Schedule

The California Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) establishes the reimbursement amounts due to providers for medical treatment furnished to injured workers. However, rather than reimbursing providers the reimbursement amounts due per the OMFS, Hartford uses Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) to reduce the reimbursements paid to providers.

For Hartford medical treatment bills, this table reflects the OMFS Reimbursement Due to daisyBill clients for medical treatment provided to injured workers. Hartford Reimbursement Reduction reflects the amount Hartford failed to pay daisyBill clients. The Hartford Reduced Reimbursement reflects the reimbursement amount Hartford ultimately reimbursed daisyBill providers.

78%
Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS)
OMFS Reimbursement Due
$2,665,096
100.0%
Hartford Reimbursement Reduction
$580,401
21.8%
Hartford Reduced Reimbursement
$2,084,694
78.2%

Hartford CALIFORNIA DATA - PENALTY & INTEREST

If Hartford fails to remit payment within mandated time frames, California law requires the claims administrator to “self-execute” Penalty and Interest payments directly to the provider. Often claims administrators fail to self-execute these Penalities and Interest (P&I).

Using e-billing data, daisyBill calculates the Total P&I Due to daisyBill clients and the amount of P&I Hartford reported paying our clients.

The Penalty & Interest Balance Due displayed here is the amount Hartford failed to self-execute to daisyBill clients as mandated by California law.

$312,291
Penalty and Interest Balance Due
Total Penalty & Interest Due*
$330,195
Self-Executed Penalty & Interest Paid
$17,904
Penalty & Interest Balance Due
$312,291
Bill Transmission Year
Bill Count
EOR Receipt Count
EOR Missing Count*
Payment Late Count
Penalty Due
Interest Due
Total P&I Due
2019
15,849
11,961
75%
3,888
25%
931
8%
$37,125
$22,570
$59,695
2020
15,853
11,066
70%
4,787
30%
1,203
11%
$45,446
$29,088
$74,534
2021
19,581
13,459
69%
6,122
31%
1,342
10%
$54,125
$34,635
$88,760
2022
18,146
11,343
63%
6,803
37%
661
6%
$27,577
$23,253
$50,830
2023
26,246
23,276
89%
2,970
11%
1,005
4%
$40,898
$6,778
$47,676
2024
6,596
6,442
98%
154
2%
202
3%
$7,678
$1,022
$8,700
Total
102,271
77,547
76%
24,724
24%
5,344
7%
$212,848
$117,347
$330,195

Once a bill payment is 45 calendar days overdue, daisyBill calculates Penalty and Interest amounts owed. Total P&I Due may slightly overstate the amount owed by Hartford in the instances where the underlying employer is a government employer, as California allows government employers 60 calendar days to timely reimburse workers' comp bills.

*EOR Missing Count reflects the instances where Hartford failed to electronically send the provider an EOR, therefore, daisyBill could not calculate whether P&I is due for these e-bills where the EOR is missing. Data updates daily.

Hartford CALIFORNIA DATA - EDI COMPLIANCE

Commencing October 2012, California law mandates claims administrators must accept the electronic submission of complete medical bills (‘e-bills’) from providers. For e-bills, the California Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) Medical Billing and Payment Guide establishes timeframes by which claims administrators (aka payers) must acknowledge, object to, pay, and provide an Explanation of Review (EOR) in response to all e-bills sent by workers’ comp providers.

Using the collective data from daisyBill clients’ e-bills, below the data reports how often Hartford both complied and failed to comply with the mandated California e-billing requirements and timeframes when processing e-bills sent by daisyBill clients.

X12 837 e-Bill Acceptance

California law requires Hartford to accept workers’ comp e-bills from providers, including accepting Second Review appeals providers send electronically.

daisyBill transmits all bills and Second Review appeals electronically to Hartford using the X12 837 EDI standard as required by DWC Rule 7.1. When Hartford fails to compliantly accept an e-bill, daisyBill uses a non-EDI method (fax, email or mail) to transmit a paper bill to Hartford for processing.

For bills submitted last quarter, the table below reports the frequency at which Hartford compliantly accepts e-bills daisyBill compliantly sent using the required X12 837 EDI standard. The table also reports the frequency at which Hartford fails to compliantly accept e-bills, thereby forcing providers to submit non-EDI paper bills to Hartford.

 To learn more, review the sample Audit Complaints daisyBill submits to the California DWC to report EDI noncompliance

91%
X12 837 EDI Compliant
Bill Transmission
Original Bill
Second Review Appeal
Total
X12 837 EDI Compliant
837 Compliant
25,787
97%
4,113
66%
29,900
91%
Yes
837 Not Accepted
884
3%
2,162
34%
3,046
9%
No

X12 277 Acknowledgement - Timeliness

Within two working days after receipt of an e-bill, Hartford must electronically send the provider a X12 277 Acknowledgement (277 ACK) verifying that Hartford either accepted or rejected the e-bill for payment adjudication. Upon receipt of a 277 ACK that accepts an e-bill, the provider has proof that Hartford received the e-bill for processing.

The table below reports how often Hartford compliantly sends 277 ACK notices to daisyBill clients within two working days of receipt of the e-bill.

 Review the sample Audit Complaints daisyBill submits to the California DWC to report EDI non-compliance.

97%
X12 277 Timeliness Compliant
Bill Transmission
Original Bill
Second Review Appeal
Total
X12 277 Timeliness Compliant
277 Timely
24,961
97%
3,965
96%
28,926
97%
Yes
277 Missing
1
0%
0
0%
1
0%
No
277 Untimely
809
3%
145
4%
954
3%
No

X12 277 Acknowledgement - Invalid e-Bill Rejections

For rejected e-bills, the 277 ACK includes STC segments with a Claim Status Category Code (STC Category) and a Claim Status Code (STC Code) explaining the reason for the e-bill rejection. The DWC allows claims administrators to reject e-bills only for a strictly defined set of (mostly technical) reasons. A 277 ACK cannot function as an electronic Explanation of Review (e-EOR) to deny payment. 

The table below lists the instances where Hartford sent 277 ACKs with invalid STC Category and STC Codes that non-compliantly rejected e-bills for reasons other than allowed by the DWC. Rather than properly returning electronic Explanations of Review (e-EORs) explaining reasons for payment denial, Hartford non-compliantly rejected the e-bills with improper STC Category and Codes.

 Review the sample Audit Complaints daisyBill submits to the California DWC to report EDI non-compliance.

84%
X12 277 STC Compliant
Bill Transmission
Original Bill
Second Review Appeal
Total
X12 277 STC Compliant
STC Accept
22,078
86%
3,064
75%
25,142
84%
Yes
STC Reject
51
0%
0
0%
51
0%
Yes
STC N/A (277 Missing)
1
0%
0
0%
1
0%
Yes
STC Invalid - Reject Second Review
0
0%
1,046
25%
1,046
4%
No
STC Invalid - Reject Injury Claim Valid
910
4%
0
0%
910
3%
No
STC Invalid - Reject Category/Code
1,379
5%
0
0%
1,379
5%
No
STC Invalid - Reject Prior Accept
1,352
5%
0
0%
1,352
5%
No

X12 835 EOR

DWC Rule 7.1 requires Hartford to electronically send an Explanation of Review (EOR) to the provider using the X12 835 EDI standard. When a provider sends an Original e-bill, Hartford must electronically send the EOR within 15 working days after receipt of the e-bill from the provider. For Second Review e-bills, Hartford must electronically send the provider an EOR within 14 calendar days after receipt of the Second Reiew e-bill from the provider.

The table below reports the frequency at which Hartford compliantly sends X12 835 EORs to daisyBill clients.

 Review the sample Audit Complaints daisyBill submits to the California DWC to report EDI noncompliance.

77%
X12 835 Compliant
X12 EDI Standard
Original e-Bill
Second Review Appeal
Total
X12 835 Compliant
835 Compliant
16,720
76%
2,526
82%
19,246
77%
Yes
835 Missing
3,538
16%
174
6%
3,712
15%
No
835 Late
778
4%
361
12%
1,139
5%
No
835 Invalid Data
1,042
5%
3
0%
1,045
4%
No

Although daisyBill makes every effort to ensure our information is accurate, we assume no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site, directory, or blog. The information contained in this site is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness. All data on this website is subject to change without notice to improve function, reliability, design, or otherwise. Visitors to this website should take all steps necessary to ascertain that information you receive from this website is correct and has been verified.